Particular Sexual and Ambitious Attitude threatens the Global Societal Functioning and Individual Wellbeing

The authors begin with the premise that mental well-being, and even quality of life in many countries worldwide, is not satisfactory. They further assert current state welfare individual can be objectively evaluated, citing World Justice Project as an example. Objective data relating to exercise power reveals societies are governed authoritarian manner. then recall findings made by Jonathan Haidt other neuroscientists, who demonstrated people conservative attitudes differ from those liberal-democratic orientations five psychological traits defined terms: harm, fairness, authority, ingroup, purity. Their own interpretation these leads formulate a hypothesis explaining why there constant tendency for regimes emerge. In next step their arguments, usually maintain patriarchal social structure, based on traditional system customary taboo, adhering religious mandates. This situation vast variations legal regulations regarding dilemmas such legality adultery, pornography, prostitution, permissibility abortion, sex education, which illustrated maps available Wikipedia. devote much attention links between views realm sexuality influence maintaining structure societies. opinion, freedom, freedom speech, well-being citizens often limited two sides: oppressive strict, purist taboo. also ponder what done counteract described situation. believe persuasive educational program should developed.